The new Portland Mall wasn't worth it
On many occasions, construction that requires a major disruption is the most feasible way to accomplish a project and get the best results. However, this was not true with adding a second MAX line through downtown Portland (or with renovating the Portland Mall). The selected plan (weaving the MAX line through the bus lanes) is not the best because:
- It requires going backwards, back to the bad ol\' days for 2+ long years
- Including during the 100th and 101st Rose Festival during that time
- Westside and many Eastside MAX riders will still have to transfer to reach PSU, City Hall, US Bancorp & Wells Fargo Towers and Union Station
- Connections between Westside MAX and S/SE buses will still be indirect or require a 2nd transfer
- It will not provide any help to cross-region (eastside-westside) travelers, many who drive
- Buses may get stuck at stops, waiting for buses and block-long MAX trains to pass
- Also, when in the passing lane, buses will have to wait for MAX to pull out
- Stops will be forced to be ~5 blocks apart
- Trips will require more walking and be less convenient, especially within the mall; this is important for people who want climate control, are disabled or carrying lots of stuff; in fact, it seems that people take transit so they don\'t have to walk
- There are other, cheaper ways to improve service within the central city
- A transit mall already is a high-quality transit corridor and does not need a rail line
- At least in the short term, most of the noise and pollution from buses will not be delt with
- Increasing the amount of buses or trains will decrease capacity for the other mode
- If the new mall works, it will be because MAX has been limited to a glorified bus
- There will be more auto access, which increases traffic & pollution (especially during peak periods) and does not encourage transit use
- The "multi-modal" left lane may get filled up with motorists and not be usable by other modes
- Pedestrians will not be able to jaywalk and be "king"
- Sidewalks at bus stops in the North Mall will be small
- Unlike on the old mall, intersections in the North Mall (Burnside & above) will not have brick
- The transitway (bus portion) will be done with asphalt and not concrete, and may get torn up like before
- Many of the improvements (besides tracks) planned do not require buses to be moved
In general, it appears that there has been much misinformation regarding this project. For example, in the March 2004 Preliminary CAC Recommendations on Conceptual Design, it states that "It enhances transit rider convenience by keeping all transit functions on one side of the street, which will require fewer street crossings." However, since stops will be 5 blocks apart, longer walks will be required and street crossings will not go down. In addition, this document also claims that "It will provide the greatest future urban design and multi-modal flexibility on 5th and 6th Avenues to adjust to changes in demand and street use over time." In reality, it will not be able to operate a high amount of either bus or MAX service and parking won\'t be possible.
Instead, MAX could have been put underground (or elevated):
- Faster trains decrease costs and increase ridership and revenues
- It is expected that 10 minutes would be saved per trip
- Trains could also be longer, further increasing efficiency
- Direct service for all MAX riders to Union Station and PSU
- Service would not be subject to disruptions from Steel Bridge lifts, parades, crashes and events
- It would relieve the bottleneck at the Rose Quarter
- Even without the Green Line, there are delays
- All of the above benefit the entire region, not just downtown
- There would be one line, one set of stations and no confusion
- The present MAX line would be turned into a streetcar
- Could allow parking and auto access on Morrison, Yamhill, 1st and Holladay
- Mall service would be provided by frequent, quiet, low-polluting shuttle buses
- Or, have all PSU service go to Union Station and possibly Lloyd Center
- At least consolidate PSU service to 1-2 stops; on the old mall, buses serving PSU were spread across all four stops
- MAX trains are out-of-scale with the street environment
- No construction disruptions except at stations (like the Big Pipe)
- Allows for segregation of pay and free riders, and possibly better fare collection
- This would be useful after special events, where many people\'s fares could be checked efficiently
- Many people agree that a tunnel (or elevated) will still be needed in the future
- If so, the money spent on the present project will be wasted
If grade-separating MAX really isn\'t feasible, it could have been put in the left lane on the mall. MAX would not affect buses and stop spacing for both would be flexible. If increased vehicle access really does help business, there would be plenty of room for it in the bus lanes during off-peak periods.
A: Possible "shared left" bike/skate lane (seperated from pedestrians by bollards/trees)
B: Off-peak taxis/deliveries or autos
C: Possible curb extension to prevent conflicts between buses and right-turning autos, also makes buses in the center lane more visible to pedestrians, reducing crash risk.
D: Bus stop; some could be for peak-only lines and used for parking or deliveries off-peak.
Benefits:
- Only configuration that keeps trains separate, stuff simple
(it seems that buses mix better w/autos than w/trains) - A bus or train incident does not affect the other mode
- MAX platforms can be put on any block, easily moved
- Allows variety of street use--150 buses/hour or parking
- Also allows increase in trains with little impact to buses
- More, closer bus stops (assumes ones across from MAX)
- Mall/Blue Line rail transfers require no street crossing
- Room for non-bus stop blocks, w/real parking or loading
- Can allow both right and left turns (like on Morrison St)
- May be able to keep buses on mall during construction
(major work occurs in left lane, with middle lane as buffer)
Drawbacks:
- Stations can be better on right side in some places
- Trains must cross to other side of street and back
Without MAX there, the left lane should be limited to bicycles and other human-powered vehicles during peak periods. Many users, especially newer ones, skaters and skateboarders, are not willing to mix with traffic. And while the Park Blocks are nice, none of the intersections are signalized. Overall, it would really show that Portland supports other forms of transportation.
"On the face of it, building light-rail along Interstate 205 to Clackamas County and installing it along Fifth and Sixth avenues, from Portland State University to Union Station, were two distinct projects. Had the federal government chosen to treat them that way, nothing would have happened downtown."
--An inspired hookup, July 04, 2009, Oregonian editorial
Buses return to Portland\'s revamped transit mall - OregonLive.com
City and TriMet sued for $760,000 - KOINLocal6.com (this was regarding access being limited to the entrance to the Standard Plaza parking garage on the right side of 5th Ave. If MAX was underground or on the left side of the street, direct access from 5th could still be safely allowed. In addition, there was another complaint with the Hotel Modera\'s access to the right side of 6th being closed.)